Panmankey

The internet home of Jason Mankey

Blog

view:  full / summary

Blog on the Move

Posted by panmankey on August 18, 2011 at 4:00 PM Comments comments (0)

I've found that it's easier to link to my blog after moving it off of panmankey.com   If you enjoy reading blogs mine can be found at:  www.deeppaganthoughts.blogspot.com   I tend to update it at least twice a week.   

Blessed Be!
-jason

Sensationalism and Christianity

Posted by panmankey on March 31, 2011 at 5:16 PM Comments comments (0)
My blog is also available here:

Sensationalism and Christianity

On an almost yearly basis there is a discovery that the media claims "will change Christianity." Usually those claims fall into two categories, both over the top. The first is the "this will rock the foundations of Christianity" discovery. The translation and publication of the Gospel of Judas a few years ago is a text book example of this type of discovery.

The publication of the Gospel of Judas was feted with a coming out party in National Geographic Magazine, in several books, and on the Nat Geo cable TV channel. It was picked up all over the internet and was featured in all kinds of news broadcasts. The truth about the Gospel of Judas was that it wasn't all that interesting. Sure, it's always fascinating to discover a lost tangent of one of the many early Christianities, but the Gospel of Judas was a late-comer. Most likely written hundreds of years after the death of Jesus it really wasn't all that earth shattering.

The idea that Judas wasn't a betrayer and was simply doing his job struct many Christians as blasphemous, but the idea had been proposed before. If someone could think of it in the 1970's as a plausible explanation for the behavior of Judas, it's not unreasonable to think someone else might have thought about it in 200 BCE. Depending on your view of the crucifixion, Judas could be looked upon as the "Good Guy." Jesus can't die for your sins if he doesn't die. If I was starting a church in the year 200 and was looking for apostolic authority to do so, Judas would seem an unlikely choice, but if he was the only choice left . . . . . you could certainly rationalize it to make sense.

Students of early Christianity know that there were probably hundreds of gospels, and while we don't have all of those gospels today, we have many of them. The Gospel of Judas was no more revolutionary than the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, and we don't talk about that last one very much these days. The Gospel of Judas was new though, and in these days of internet hype and the latest flavor it made a lot of people curious. That curiosity was of course short lived, and despite media warnings to the contrary, the Gospel of Judas did not have any significant impact on modern Christianity.

A few years before the Gospel of Judas hysteria the other type of "Christian discovery" was picked up by the media. This was one of those discoveries that "proved Christianity was real by proving Jesus was a real person." The "James son of Joseph brother of Jesus" ossuary (Jewish Bone Box) was a sensation. There were several scholars who defended its authenticity, and when it went on display in Toronto there were standing room only crowds around it.

The ossuary was undoubtedly real. It was a two thousand year old stone box, dating to the time of Jesus, and its use was common at that time. The only problem with the ossuary was the inscription, "James son of Joseph brother of Jesus." Even if that inscription is 100% authentic it's not earth shattering. James, Josephus, and even Jesus were extremely common names. If you came across something that said "Jason son of Michael brother of William" you wouldn't find it all that interesting, because those are pretty average names.

The Israel Antiquities Authority determined the inscription on the ossuary to be a hoax, specifically the "brother of Jesus" line. To me, even if the inscription were 100% authentic it wouldn't change anything. I'm already reasonably sure that Jesus was a real person, and even more so James (he's mentioned in Paul's letters). I'm also pretty sure that they were brothers. The existence of the ossuary doesn't prove that Jesus rose from the dead, and to me is more confirmation that he was simply who scholars think he was: A prophet of peasants and an inspiring figure.

This all leads me to the latest and newest greatest find in the field of Christian scholarship "the biggest find since the Dead Sea Scrolls" and according to one scholar "the major discovery of Christian history." The discovery in question, seventy tiny books with lead pages bound together with wire, has launched all sorts of speculation. Since some of the books are sealed people are already saying they could be the "lost codices described in the Book of Revelation." Other claims have these books as the first Christian texts, possibly dating from the time of Christ himself. I wish journalists would downplay the sensational and that people would concentrate more on the facts when dealing with these things.

First of all the books are said to come from one of the caves Jews and Christians used to hide in as the Romans destroyed the Second Temple. According to the scholars who haven't dismissed this "major discovery of Christian history" as a hoax, the oxidation on the books dates them to this period of history. So if we can reasonably date them to 70 CE, that's still forty years after the death of Jesus and a little over twenty years after Paul's first letter. Writings from the "time of Jesus" these are not, at best they are second generation and post-Pauline.

Since these writings obviously came from Jerusalem, they would be from the Jewish Christians who had set up shop in Jerusalem after the death of Christ. Those Jewish Christians were later marginalized as the Christian Church began to be appeal almost exclusively to gentiles and became more Pauline. (The break between Paul and the Church in Jerusalem was strained during Paul's lifetime.) As a result, the philosophies contained in those tiny books might be rather different from those found in modern Christianity.

The idea that some of these sealed volumes might somehow relate to the Book of Revelation is fascinating, but not surprising. It's not surprising because Revelation is such a source of fascination to so many Christians that people constantly look to link to it. Since Revelation is so ambiguous that's easy to do. Secondly, if Revelation was written in response to persecution by the Emperor Nero the date of composition theorized for these small books aligns almost perfectly.

As a student of history and religion the revelations possibly contained in these books will not be about the authenticity of Jesus. Instead, I see them as a light towards better understanding the evolution of Christian thought and liturgy. If they came from the Jerusalem Church, even better. I'm curious as to what Jewish Christians thought as they saw the Temple destroyed.

Discoveries in the Holy Land and of ancient texts do little to dim or spark belief amongst the skeptics and the believers. They might possibly kindle interest in things historical for short periods of time, but nothing unearthed or translated will ever prove or disprove the existence of Jesus. While I don't think faith should blind us from reality, there are some things science will never prove or disprove, the reality of deity is one of them, and that's an article of faith.

When Someone asks me if I think "Jesus was was the Son of God?" you get a very long response.

Posted by panmankey on March 7, 2011 at 7:31 PM Comments comments (0)
Over the weekend a friend of mine asked me if I believed that Jesus was the son of God, and though not said, I have to believe that he also wondered if I accepted Jesus as the messiah or as my personal savior.  When you are me, and you believe in the validity of nearly all religions*, such questions are hard to answer with a simple yes or no.  I certainly don't believe in the modern evangelical Christian reconstruction of Jesus, with its emphasis on only one side of the message-accepting him as savior, while ignoring the messages of social justice and acceptance of others.  I also can't just look at a religious text and accept it at face value, I have to look at the environment in which it was written, and how it stacks up against other literature of the time period.   Whoever created us gave us minds, so I assume we are supposed to use them.   
I believe in God, or deity, or gods, or the Divine, or the Ultimate Mover, I believe in something at the heart of the universe.  I am not an atheist.  The world is too wonderful to just be total random chance, something set things into motion, and over the millennia we have worshipped and formed that something into a construct we can understand.  Archeology today is pretty good.  You can name nearly any god out there and I can give you a history about how that god's worship evolved.  Yahweh had his Asherah, Aphrodite carried a spear, and Cernunnous flung around bags of cash.  These things can be argued, but it's like arguing the sky is blue, some things are just facts, and they are often uncomfortable.
 
Due to my interest in all things historical and my desire to seek facts and the origins of things, I've come to discount the literalness of holy books.  This doesn't just apply to your holy book, it applies to mine as well.  I don't take Bullfinch or Homer literally, but that's not to say there aren't truths there.  I think nearly all holy books are divinely inspired, and that the individuals who wrote them were trying their best to present truths and ideas to their followers.  Sure, there are moments when politics slip in there, but for the most part, holy books present pathways to deity, provide a moral compass,** and offer hope and solace in times of trouble.  The fact that I doubt Job or Noah existed as written in the Old Testament doesn't stop their stories from presenting truths, or helping to connect a worshipper with deity.  Just because something is not true doesn't make it false, so to speak.  
 
So I comb through books looking for information about deity/deities, even while not literally believing their stories.  There's a third part about me too, and that's the part that makes me a religious thinker and not a religious scholar (though I respect scholars, can talk scholar, and can read scholars), I seek the divine***.  I want to commune with deity.  I want to have a relationship with deity.  I believe everyone can do those things, and I believe that many people do.  When someone tells me they have a relationship with Jesus, I believe them.  Their religious experience is certainly as valid as mine.  I do believe that people can get the messages mixed up, and that gods don't ask us to crash planes into buildings or bomb abortion clinics, but for the most part relationship with deity helps us with our daily struggles, provides comfort, and usually acts as a mechanism that helps us make good decisions.  Before the atheists chime in, yes you can pretty much do all that without deity, some of us just need help, and I don't want to talk to myself.  It's much easier to mutter under my breath to Pan.
 
So this leads us to the Jesus question.  Yes, I believe in Jesus.  Though the historical proof of his existence is pretty sketchy, I'm 99% sure that there was a guy who wandered the Galilee preaching some of the things currently in the New Testament at the time of John the Baptist.  I say that Jesus' existence was sketchy because there's no record of him during his own lifetime.  The first mention of "Christians" occurs in the year 50, and that's about the same time the Apostle Paul started writing letters about him, and that's all twenty years after his death.  Josephus might have referenced Jesus^ but that's still over forty years after his death, as are the gospels.  Mark wasn't written until at least the year 70^^ so it has the same problems as Josephus.  I'm going with Jesus was real because he obviously had followers within fifteen years of his death, and Paul's letters make it clear than people like Peter and James (the brother of the Lord) knew him personally.  Those are silly details to include if you aren't writing about an actual person.
 
So, I believe in Jesus, but I don't think he was the Jewish messiah.  There are a lot of problems with accepting Jesus as the Jewish Messiah, mostly because the Jewish Messiah was supposed to be radically different from Jesus.  This causes problems if you are saying that your religion is the true continuation of the story presented in the Old Testament.  The Jewish Messiah was supposed to be a great political figure, and a military one, and he was supposed to bring glory to Israel.  He was also supposed to be a human being, and not a part of God in the literal sense, or turn the monotheism of Josiah into something else.  Jesus certainly filled some messianic prophecy during his own lifetime, but he didn't do all the things the Old Testament prophets said a messiah would do, for example:
 
"The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them."  Isaiah 11:6
 
You can certainly interpret that as meaning that the messiah will bring peace to the world, but a quick look around shows that there is very little peace in the world.  Heck I can't think of a sustained period of peace in the last three thousand years of history.  So obviously that doesn't work, and Jesus was not a little child during his ministry.
 
That is just one example, and there are lots of examples of Jesus not literally fulfilling messianic prophecy.  I guess the argument could be that you aren't meant to take all the prophecy literally, but that doesn't make sense since apparently we are meant to take the rest of it literally.  (You can't have it both ways.)  Besides, the word "messiah" simply means "anointed one" and Isaiah^^^ names his messiah in Chapter 45 verse 1:
 
"This is what the LORD says to his anointed,  to Cyrus, whose right hand I take hold of to subdue nations before him  and to strip kings of their armor,  to open doors before him so that gates will not be shut:"
 
Much like the sataan in the road appearing in the road to stop Balaam and his talking donkey being  translate as angel instead of "satan" or "obstacle~" messiah is translated here as anointed one to avoid confusion later on.  That doesn't change the fact that Cyrus is basically called the messiah for allowing the Jews to rebuild their Temple in Jerusalem.  These are the things my mind deals with on a daily basis, it would be far easier just not to know this stuff and wander along with the herd, but I can't do that, and that's why we are now up to seven little end note thingies at the bottom of the page.  
 
So when looking at Jesus through the prism of Judaism in First Century Palestine, it's hard for me to think of him as the Jewish Messiah.  Even when he does fulfill Old Testament prophecy it sometimes feels contrived and phony.  To get Jesus to Bethlehem Luke has to invent a census that makes no sense in the context of Ancient Rome, and that there's no historical proof of.  One could also argue that the majority of Old Testament prophecy fulfilled by Jesus was added by the gospel writers and didn't actually happen during his lifetime.~~  I don't think such a hypothesis is all that far fetched, especially in Matthew where the mission of the gospel writer is to prove to a Jewish audience that Jesus was in fact "the" messiah.
 
If Jesus wasn't the Jewish Messiah, what was he?  In my mind (and in those of many who study the "Historical Jesus") he was a brilliant preacher and most probably a healer whose message appealed to many Jews outside of Jerusalem.  Jesus was a social reformer, pure and simple, and a damned good one, with an amazing message to share.  Jesus challenged the high and the mighty, and was fed up with the economic inequality in First Century Palestine.  All of that "Prosperity Gospel" stuff you read today is just bullshit, Jesus would have been horrified.   
 
And so Jason went to the Book of Luke and copied and pasted the "Beatitudes."  
 
"Blessed are you poor, for yours is the kingdom of God."
"Blessed are you that hunger now, for you shall be satisfied." "Blessed are you that weep now, for you shall laugh."
"Blessed are you when men hate you, and when they exclude you and revile you, and cast out your name as evil, on account of the Son of man!  Rejoice in that day, and leap for joy, for behold, your reward is great in heaven; for so their fathers did to the prophets." 
"But woe to you that are rich, for you have received your consolation." 
"Woe to you that are full now, for you shall hunger. "
"Woe to you that laugh now, for you shall mourn and weep." 
"Woe to you, when all men speak well of you, for so their fathers did to the false prophets."
 
That is not the message of a man who is comfortable with the wealthy.  That is not a man who is happy when someone's belly is overfull and there are those whose bellies are empty.   This is a man preaching to the most down trodden of the down trodden, promising them something better in the next life, and warning the elite that they shall be judged for their neglect of their fellow man.  
 
I don't want to get into the whole "Jesus was a socialist" argument today.  I'm not going to say that he was (or wasn't), but it's obvious that Jesus was not comfortable with the world's wealth concentrated in just a few hands (sort of like it is right now!).  If you are a Christian, I'm still baffled how you can be against taxing the ultra rich for the benefit of everyone else#, if Jesus could have taxed the Emperor or the Priests of the Temple and then given that money to the poor, he certainly would have.  There's no question about that.  The top of the pyramid was rotten, both Jewish and pagan, and he was pissed off about it.  I'm sure he was a little bit apocalyptic too, promising an end of days if things didn't change, fair enough, lots of people were back then##.  
 
To get back to one of the original questions we started with several hours ago in writing time, was Jesus the son of God (in my opinion)?  I think we are all "Sons and Daughters of Deity," and that as a Jew Jesus certainly saw himself as a "Son of God," but I don't think he was a piece of Yahweh, or Yahweh transformed into the flesh.  However, you'll notice many (many, many) paragraphs at the start of this that I wrote "we have worshipped and formed that something into a construct we can understand."  I think Deity exists and is real, but I think we form it, I think we shape it.  We take the divine energy of God and help transform it into something valuable for ourselves.  Deity in its wisdom has given us many paths to it, and it takes the shapes and forms that we need it to so we can better understand it.  In that sense, yes, Jesus is the Son of God, and worthy of worship.
 
I certainly don't just think that Jesus was just an extraordinary man and that the billions of prayers uttered in his name over the past 1900 years have just faded into the ether.  No, there is a Christ### out there, a deity whose followers need his forgiveness, and the gospel that was written in his name.  So I don't deny the divinity of Christ, many of the gods we worship (or have worshipped) certainly began their existence as normal people, and then through the power of faith were transformed into something more than that, something divine and glorious.  Blasphemous to some I'm sure, but it's what happens when you live inside books with "Oxford Press" on their spines.  
 
In some ways the gods need us as we need them.  We help to shape that Cosmic Power that created the universe and nudged us along from little fishies to the humans we are today.  While I don't think Jesus was the Jewish Messiah or a literal part of Yahweh, I think I can still have a relationship with Him, and I hope that more people in the 21st Century actual bother to read his words.  We need them just as much today as the people of Palestine did in the year 30.
 
 
 
 
 
 
*I can't wrap my head around Satanism, which is the glorification of the ego, and I will make fun of Scientology until my dying day.  I'm pretty tolerant, but I have limits.  
 
**A Viking's moral compass in the 12th Century might have been different from a Christian monk's, but let's not kid ourselves, all three societies in Europe at the time-pagan, Christian, and Muslim were very violent.  The Vikings were just more randomly violent.  
 
*** I know scholars who do those things, but they separate those things from their research.  I mix it all up together because these notes aren't peer reviewed, just peer criticized or cheered.   
 
^Josephus' reference to Jesus was obviously tampered with after the book was copied and recopied.  He certainly never wrote anything like "if he was a man at all."  He was a Jew, he would have seen Jesus as a Jew, and that's just how it is.  
 
^^That's the consensus of the majority of Christian scholars, and not just a slight majority, I'd say about 98% of them.  It's not up for debate today.   
 
^^^Scholarly consensus is that Isaiah was written by three different people, and those three different writings were contained on one scroll "The Isaiah Scroll."  I call all three writers Isaiah, but they were three unique individuals.  This doesn't take away from the brilliance of the writing, or the truthiness of it, it just is.  
~In the Old Testament Balaam disobeys God and the Lord sends a "sataan" to block his path.  Sataan simply means "obstacle," but you can imagine the conundrum if the obstacle sent by Yahweh was called a "sataan" or even just "an obstacle."  As a result it's usually translated as angel, which is right sort of, but also wrong in a way.   Read Numbers sometime and replace "angel" with "obstacle," you'll notice how much more easily the text reads.    
 
~~I don't believe that entirely.  I think Jesus probably tried to fulfill some of the prophecies when he entered Jerusalem in order to attract attention to himself, and by extension, his message for the Temple Priests and Roman Authorities.   
 
#When you look at taxes as a whole, the rich pay less taxes as a percentage than the poor.  When I say "tax" I'm looking at the whole enchilada, not just income tax.  We pay sales taxes, payroll taxes, property taxes, tolls etc.  As a middle class person I pay more of my income as a percentage than most of the super rich.  Remember payroll taxes stop being collected after a certain (rather low) point, so anyone who reads this is certainly paying a higher percentage of payroll tax as it relates to total income than Charlie Sheen or Paris Hilton.  So I'm guess I'm not even arguing for a real redistribution of wealth, I just want everyone to pay the same percentage in overall taxes.  This piece is not about taxes, though again, it's hard to picture Jesus being happy with the top 1% controlling 90% of the wealth.  If you don't believe that, please re-read your Bible.
 
##Christian Charity is capable of amazing things, no doubt about it, and I don't want any of my Christian friends to think I'm not aware of it.  "Operation Blessing" (Pat Robertson's group) was on the ground in New Orleans before the federal government was.  I know many good middle class Christian who give money to their churches that is used for the benefit of humanity.  However, there are thousands of people out there who don't do that, and many of them are billionaires.  The Koch Brothers don't give a shit about giving money to charities that actually help people, they give money to groups that keep their taxes low and let them pollute the Earth and bust up unions.  Many are doing wonderful things in the name of Christ, many are doing horrible atrocious things in the name of "conservatism" and that has nothing to do with Jesus or Christianity.  
 
###PBS had a special on about ten years ago called "From Jesus to Christ," which sums up sort of how I feel about it.   Even though "Christ" is just Greek for "anointed" I use it to represent the spiritual, cosmic power of Jesus.  Jesus was a man, Christ is what that man became.   

Robert Johnson, The Blues, and Me.

Posted by panmankey on March 3, 2011 at 6:41 PM Comments comments (0)
I'm not much of a modern blues fan.  I grew up loving Led Zeppelin, and since then I've been a devotee of British Blues, but not so much the American version.  There is an exception to that though, I love the old, real, Mississippi Delta Blues.  Those blues aren't played through a Les Paul either, or an amp for that matter, I like the old muddy acoustic guitar and a scraggly voice blues of Robert Johnson and Leadbelly.  Songs that are only a few yards removed from field hollers and spirituals.
 
Of course the blues are a lot farther from field hollers than most of us think.  Like anything else, the blues were 50% organic inspiration and 50% commercial calculation.  The earliest "blues" artists were professional musicians like W.C. Handy and Ma Rainey, and while they might have been inspired by something that preceded them, they infused the blues with an early commercial sensibility.
 
It's easy to cloud your mind when talking about the blues with visions of dirty juke-joints, bluesmen hitch-hiking across the country, and scorned women in every town, but young men didn't become involved in the blues to live a life of poverty.  Guys started playing the blues in the 1920's for women, money, and fame, the same reason people become rock stars now.  No one dreamed about becoming a poor blues singer.
 
That's why men went down to the crossroads to get their guitars tuned.  You went down there about midnight to see the big black man (or sometimes dog), and that's where you learned to play the blues.  Today those journeys to the crossroads are all about "selling your soul to the Devil," but the petitioners at the crossroads never called the figure they met there the Satan or Lucifer, and only rarely the devil, and that was probably due to the influence of the white man more than anything else.  Sure, sometimes they sacrificed a chicken or three (and sometimes a blind rooster, yes the rooster had to be blind), but all kinds of cultures practice animal sacrifice.  It's not as rare as we think.
 
Some of you are thinking, "Mankey, you're nuts, there was nobody at the crossroads," but there are a lot of people who claimed to see something on those Mississippi nights.  As someone who believes in the truth of spiritual experience (regardless of faith), I can't dismiss those claims out of hand.  It's likely that something happened to them to make them think they saw something.  Perhaps they had an out of body experience, or a visitation of "power" or "energy" that felt like the presence of a deity or a powerful conjurer?  In some ways the "truth" of an encounter matters far less than the "belief" in an encounter.  If someone felt they had an experience at a crossroads, maybe it provided the encouragement and self-confidence to really play that guitar and put some conviction in that voice.
 
The crossroads myth was certainly not an invention of the early 20th Century, it has roots in Africa going back for centuries, possibly before the time of Christ.  Africa has a long tradition of crossroads deities, gods like Egba and Eshu who open the way for new possibilities and teach wisdom.  As African Religion changed and morphed in the New World, it's not surprising that details were forgotten.  Religion becomes superstition, superstition finds new life as magic, and an almost forgotten secret becomes reinvented into something that becomes useful again.  
 
It's easy to forget how important magic was in the African-American experience in the early 20th Century.  Hoodoo wasn't just a term confused with voodoo, it was a valuable, and tangible, magical path that produced real results.  People believed in it whole-heartedly.  Robert Johnson sang of it in some of his greatest songs.  "Come On In My Kitchen" has Robert singing about his girlfriend's nation sack (or mojo bag) and the consequences that come from taking something out of it.  "Hot Foot Powder" sounds like a gag gift today, but in the 1920's was a real magic powder said to rid one of bad neighbors, or to cause an ex-lover to be forever unsatisfied.   That was all in the music, and was sung about plainly and as a matter of fact, because to many at the time it was.  
 
Robert Johnson was basically unknown when he died.  He recorded only a small handful of songs, and of his surviving recordings, many of are faster or slower versions of the same song.  Johnson's recorded work consists entirely of his acoustic guitar and his haunting voice, no overdubs, no edits, and no backing band.  Johnson has a minor hit with the song Terraplane Blues in 1937, and by minor hit I mean minor, it sold only 5000 copies.  Johnson wouldn't become a star until long after he died in 1938.  When British kids started to listen to American Blues in the late 1950's, Johnson's work was rediscovered, and he was reborn as "The King of the Delta Blues." 
 
A few things about Johnson's recorded work stand out.  The first is the guitar work, simply outstanding, and sometimes it sounds like there is more than one guitar at work (which has always made people think supernatural things).  The second is his sense of melody, the chorus to "Love In Vain" is infectious, and sounds like modern rock and roll (no wonder the Rolling Stones covered it/stole it in 1969).  Johnson influenced all the British Blues Rock Bands:  The Yardbirds, Zeppelin, Clapton etc.  His fingerprints are all over rock and roll.  
 
Johnson's music helped to cement the rather sinister idea that he sold his soul to the devil at the crossroads.  Though accounts differ as to whether he claimed such a thing or not (and I'm in the "not" camp) his music plays at the edges of such an idea.  In "Me and the Devil" he sings of Satan knocking at his door and him replying "Hello, Satan, I believe it's time to go."  In the actual song, Satan comes across more as an "evil spirit" than the Prince of Darkness," but words have power.  Other songs which contributed to the image of Johnson dancing with the devil were the road-weary "Hellhound on my Trail" and "Crossroads Blues."
 
These days we tend to scoff at the supernatural, and laugh at claims of the fantastic, but now and again we all look over our shoulder and wonder if there's something else out there.  One of the reasons I love the early blues so much is that you can hear that little something in the voices of those guys that implies there's something else out there.  Whether or not Robert Johnson sold his soul to the Devil or Legba, his audience believed it was possible, and a lot of his modern audience wonders about it too.  It's easy to dismiss the supernatural in music when Marilyn Manson is more joke than threat, but listening to the early blues makes me a little nervous about what all might be out there.  

Adventures February 2011

Posted by panmankey on February 28, 2011 at 6:29 PM Comments comments (0)

February has been a very busy month for me.  The biggest deal has been moving to Mountain View California.  After fourteen years in the frozen Midwest Ari and I decided it was time to leave Michigan.  So far so good in California.  The biggest adjustment has been trading in our four bedroom house for a two bedroom townhouse.  Adjusting to significantly less space and neighbors just a wall away has been the hardest part.

I might be lying there, the hardest part might be having a kitchen the size of a very small closet.  Near the end of unpacking the kitchen I said to Ari "well I've got all of our stuff for the kitchen unpacked and put away.  Unfortunately we don't have any room for food."  That's not quite true, we have some limited shelf space for food, but no pantry.  Perhaps it's a good thing, it'll force us to make better decisions about what we eat because there's no room for junk food.

While I'm sure many of you want to read about my adventures as a domestic engineer, I think I'll move this blog post along to talk about the usual February festivals.  Like I do every year, I went to Pantheacon in San Jose over President's Day Weekend.  There were several differences this year for me.  The easiest to deal with was that it was the only 15 minute drive, no plane rides and ten hour travel days for me.  It was great to be there hanging out with people, especially the sheer amount of people who remember me from year to year.  I heard my name yelled quite a bit while I was there, and being remembered is alway so flattering.  

I had great conversations in an (unfilled) bathtub, over Druid mead, and at the bar of course.  In a lot of ways it felt like Pantheacon normally does for me, lots of great people to see and talk to in a very limited amount of time.  The odd part was not doing any workshops this year.  It just ended up not working out, and considered the very recent move, it might have been for the best.  Besides, everyone knows I love Pagan Festivals for the parties.  With no workshops to worry about in the morning I can party until the wee hours of the morning.  (Though it's rare for me to make it until the wee hours, cider, scotch, and rum do take their toll.)

This past weekend I flew back "home" to Michigan for Convocation.  What a blur this year.  I don't know what it was, but it was over in the blink of an eye.  I can tell when a festival has been truly great, I'm exhausted for a full day afterwards.  I've been home now for 18 hours, got a good night's sleep, and I'm still tired and wrung out.  It's a good feeling, it means I gave it my all at the festival and left it all out there on the ritual floor.

I did three workshops this year, nothing that set the world on fire, but I thought I did a solid job at them.  Attendance was a little off by  my standards, but I think that had a lot to do with the topics.  Going in I didn't think i was really presenting very much that would have mass appeal.  I did workshops on Jim Morrison, the history of alcohol in religion, and Paganism across North America.  The alcohol one was the usual Jason lecture, Morrison close to that too, and it really wasn't about Jim as an occult figure either, more about the misconceptions about Jim's life (and death).  The "Across North America" workshop was my first thinly veiled attempt at doing something like an Ivan Stang (Church of the Sub-Genius) devival/comedy performance.  Sure, I shared information about the various festivals I've been privileged enough to attend over the years, but it was peppered with jokes, funny experiences, and experiences with various "Pagan celebrity*" types.

I think I'd like to figure out a way to do more "rant" type workshops, situations where I just make fun of Paganism (and the people in it) for a good ninety minutes.  When I look at that previous sentence it sounds pretty harsh, but in my head the ribbing of my own faith is more like a long celebrity roast.  People take religion too seriously, and they take their own religion far too seriously.  Sure, you should take your commitment to deity seriously, not to mention the moral guidance provided by faith, but after that you should be able to laugh at it.  I'm not a big fan of mixing vampirism and Paganism for example.  I think it gives all of us a rather weird reputation, but then I stop for a moment.  I think that I speak to Pan!  How is that any less absurd?  How can I in all seriousness make a judgment call about someone else's Pagan experience when I'm doing rituals to Jim Morrison and using Raspberry Hard Cider as a sacrament?  I can't.  

That doesn't mean I shouldn't make fun of it though.  If we can't laugh at our religious foibles and start placing people up on pedestals that they don't belong on, Paganism risks becoming what it's different from, monotheistic faiths that seem to have lost their senses of humor thousands of years ago.  I want to laugh at things, I want you to laugh at things with me, and I want our faith(s) to bring us joy, to me laughter is joy.  I get the joke, I hope you do too.

That went to places I had not anticipated . . . .  . . .

In addition to workshops I did a ritual on Saturday night (which has become kind of a tradition at Convocation).  The past few years I've done Morrison Rituals, Pan Rituals, and a Horned God Ritual, but this year I went for the serious jugular and submitted a "Traditional Greek Ritual Honoring Aphrodite and Dionysus."  Sure, I picked fun deities, but "traditional Greek Ritual" is not a bacchanal, and is a pretty straight laced type of ritual.  I thought I had explained that in the program book, but as the weekend went along and people kept coming up to me telling me how excited they were about the "Dionysus Ritual" I started thinking that I'd have to change it up a little bit.

I didn't change much other than my attitude, less serious with more jokes, and then adding a "calling down" portion.  The ritual was supposed to simply contain Homeric Hymns, sacrifices, libations, votive offerings, and prayers.  The early pre-ritual feedback indicated that people were expecting more of the "Mankey Pop," deity energy and transformative experience.  So at the end of the ritual we did some "calling down" of the gods, with some success I think.  I certainly felt the push and pull of Dionysus and Aphrodite all night and into the morning.  I don't think the pop wore off for until 12 hours later when I finally took a quick nap at 9:00 am before getting up at 10:00 am.  

So the ritual was pretty successful, and fun, and something I'll keep on the books for awhile and might do again when I get involved with a group out here.  About the only complaint I got was about the wine, which was mixed in the traditional Greek manner, meaning it was 3/4 water and 1/4 wine.  That saves me money on ritual supplies at least, but I can see why people didn't care for it very much, our palettes are just not accustomed to watered down wine.

Speaking of wine, I got a new wine glass while I was at Convocation.  There was a bellydance group there named Belly Dance Underground and they had these fabulous glass looking wine glasses that were really plastic.  Every time I saw them around I sampled their drinks (mostly fabulous!) and ended up being given one on saturday night, with the promise that I mention them on my blog.  So here you go, living up to that promise.  On a personal note, when I see a group of girls dressed up in bellydance gear at a Pagan gathering with drinks in their hands, they have to know I'm going to bug them.  I'm not made of stone.  So fun times.  

So between workshops, parties, and ritual I had a great time.  Even though it's only been a few weeks it was good to see my Michigan peeps again.  Leaving this time really felt like I was closing the door on that chapter of my life (though I'll be opening it at least once a year).  I'm not much of a karaoke guy, and have tried hard to avoid it the past few years, but I had an itching at Convocation this year to sing Black Sabbath's "War Pigs."  I left a party I was enjoying just to go sing and butcher the song.  Unfortunately someone taped it, and when I say I like being laughed at you can take it to the bank, because I'm sharing the link to my warbling:


*There is no such thing as a "Pagan Celebrity."  Sure, there are people smarter than you tout here, and certainly people smarter than me, but at the end of the day we all shit on the same portajohn and eat the same sub-standard room service food.  No one is dining on caviar, and only a few of us are drinking 21 year old scotch, and that's only because I'm super nice and I enjoy, you know, talking to people.  

Ghosts crowd the young child's fragile eggshell mind

Posted by panmankey on January 7, 2011 at 8:43 PM Comments comments (0)

Awake, shake dreams from your hair my pretty child, my sweet one . . . . . . . .


My love for The Doors and Jim Morrison often creeps up on me.  Due to their significance in my spiritual life, it can be hard to just listen to The Doors without entering a trance like state.  I'm cool with the ocassional Top 40 Doors song being on the radio, but anything more than that sort of raises the beast so to speak.


I like to say that Led Zeppelin (or perhaps Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers) is my favorite band, but I probably know more about The Doors, and I certainly know their musical catalog better.  Some of that's due to Jim being more of a crooner than a white blues belter like Robert Plant, but much of it's simply due to the transformative power of the music.


Not every Doors song is art, and some of them border on atrocious, but many of them are near perfection.  And if they are a bit over the top lyriclly, at least Jim did it first.  It's kind of funny to yell "Fuck the Mother Kill the Father," in 2010, but in the mid-60's that was something that could have gotten you jailed in Alabama.  I'm not going to argue that it was in good taste, or even ahead of its time, it was probably neither, but it was ballsy.


I don't think Jim Morrison will ever be celebrated as one of the great poets of the 20th Century, but he might deserve to be.  For every great Morrison lyric, there are two shitty ones, but the ones that are great, are truly great, and when spoken they are nearly hypnotic.  There's a cadence and a rhythm to Morrison's poetry that is so easily overlooked when it simply stares at you from the printed page.  His words were meant to breathe, to be heard, to be spoken.  Despite the attempts of his bandmates, I'm not sure all of this words need to be put to music either.


The Doors "American Prayer" is mostly a collection of Morrison poetry readings with the band adding background music nearly a decade later.  Like much of The Doors' catalog, some of it works, and some of it fails.  Parts of the music reflect the era in which it was recorded (the late '70's), and sounds nearly discoesque.  The tracks that work nail the whole Dionysian Doors Live in Concert Bacchanalia sort of thing they had going down in the late 60's.  No band screams "Decadent Transcendent Pagans!" quite like The Doors.  I'm not using Pagan there to reflect a deeply held religious belief.  I'm using Pagan more to describe a way of life, a world of phsysical and spiritual ecstasy, the path of excess, an existance spent in technicolor instead of black and white.


If I could deal with the hangovers, I'd spend my life with my head swimming in a wine glass, my face pressed up against the glass to listen to The Doors.  There's something very pleasant about tipsiness, even more so when that drunken feeling is spent with words and music.  There's a lonliness to it, but you can find great joy while being alone.  I think Morrison essentially lived his entire life in the Doors alone, with a bottle for his best friend, and words as his most prized mistress. 


As I grow older spirituality can get harder and harder to grasp.  I know the steps to go through in order to feel spiritual, but it's better when it just happens.  I think when you come to a belief system the early years are the best ones, because you view everything with a sense of child-like wonder, a sense that gets lost the further down the road you go.  With a few exceptions (like sex), the first time you do something is often the best that something will ever get.  (Sex is different because it lasts longer the more you do it, which is a big relief to Ari, etc.) 


The transcendence offered to me by Jim Morrison and The Doors is just the oppossite.  It's always easy to grasp, and has become easier as the years go by (which is why I can't always listen to it).  Preparing for a Morrison Ritual tonight I began going through my Doors catalog, deciding what to play, etc.  After two glasses of wine and one verse of "Break on Through" I was dry humping Ari in the living room, screaming my fool head off, and finding myself entirely lost int he moment.  I could have been in ten other places in that moment, and it all felt pretty good, and right.


Life is change, but I'm glad that the power of Jim and his bandmates only grows. 

I blog a lot, but fail to do it here

Posted by panmankey on January 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM Comments comments (0)

I blog a lot, but for some odd reason I do almost all of it on facebook.  That's pretty stupid since I have this website, so I'm going to start blogging here again, and then posting that on facebook.  Makes more sense, and then I haven't abandoned old panmankey.com


Lots of changes in the past couple of months.  For those of you who don't read my facebook stuff, my wife and I are moving to California in February.  That's pretty big news.  We'll be living in Northern California, probably Palo Alto-give or take a few miles.  


Due to Pantheacon I do know some Pagans out West, so I've got a small network of people who know me out there, but I truly have no idea what to expect.  I'm hopeful that there will still be plenty of opportunities to talk in public and get out of the house (or apartment), but I don't know for sure.  I'm hoping that there's some sort of big outdoor festival within six hours of us.  One of the hardest parts about moving is leaving behind our time at Starwood and Brushwood.  (Not that we won't ever be back or anything, I'm sure we'll visit once every few years, but camping cross country while getting there on a plane is a logistical nightmare.)  


Finding a new group to practice with will be another challenge too.  I'm hoping we can find a BTW group that fits us, but I've been involved with about every kind of Paganism imaginable in North America the past few years, most of it works for us.  


Over the last ten years I've become a pretty effective Pagan chameleon.  I can slip in and out of different groups with relative ease, communities too.  When you do as many festivals as I do it's easy to be impressed by almost every community you visit, when you are only there for three or four days you never see the warts, or the Witch Wars.  Always a positive.  In my own neck of the woods I've managed to avoid being in negative situations pretty well the last eight or nine years.  Chalk it up to maturity, or a smaller ego, or a bigger passion for football than what people think of me.


So, changes are afoot.  We'll be in our new home state February 7th, just early enough to miss as good chunk of Michigan winter!   

One more little thing.

Posted by panmankey on July 29, 2010 at 3:54 PM Comments comments (0)


I just noticed that people can "join" my site.  I have no idea what advantages this presents to anyone, but to those of you who have, thanks!  It's kind of cool and flattering. 

Summer Festivals-3 Festivals in 6 Weeks

Posted by panmankey on July 29, 2010 at 3:50 PM Comments comments (0)

Thoughts on various festivals the last couple of weeks.


 

Wiccan Fest (an hour or so north of Toronto Canada)

Wiccan Fest was my favorite festival this summer.  Just full of nice people, enough to do, and a couple of really great stories that I will end up sharing over the next few months.  It's great when a festival knows what it is.  Wiccan Fest is a small festival designed for 300 or so people with an emphasis on community and shared experience.  It's the only festival I've ever been to where people have yelled at me "We love you Jason" for no real reason.  A little validation now and then goes a very long way.


 

It's not a very busy festival (though I was kind of busy) but there was generally enough to do to keep Jason entertained.  There were small concerts every night, and mostly featured music familiar enough that I didn't hate most of it.  For those of you who know me well, you know that such a ringing endorsement of Pagan music means that there were no bands or performers featuring a "dash of funk."  ("Dash of funk" is generally the kiss of death when any band adds that description to their festival bio.)  


 

The best part of Wiccan Fest is their drum circle.  It's not that the drumming is leaps and bounds better than the drumming at any other festival, it has more to do with the community that gathers there.  You can dance, you can drum, you can just sit and observe, and people will be friendly towards you no matter what.  I was camped near the drum circle and the community that camped around there was just freaking fabulous.  Great people, great drinking, great other things for most of them, and everyone was nice.  


 

I did five workshops at Wiccan Fest in three days, which is a pretty good amount of work.  It all went well, and I sold a decent amount of Horned God books as a result of it.  I did miss the late night rituals that have generally gone on there in the past, but that's a small point and nothing to quibble about.


 

One of the things I noticed this year at Wiccan Fest versus other festivals was how accessible the staff was.  I can go to some festivals and never run into an organizer or anyone with any authority or ability to offer me assistance.  At Fest I had people fetching me power cords and doing everything in their ability to help a blonde boy out.  Nice.


 

Starwood

I really enjoyed this year's Starwood.  Going in I thought I it would be a giant clusterfuck, and while some things didn't work out quite right, for the most part it went very smoothly.  Wisteria (the new campground) is great, lots of beautiful trees and hills, and I can see why Ari totally fell in love with the place.  It was nice.  That's not to say it was perfect.  The showers were rather dirty, and there were no flushable toilets.*  I was also a little bit disappointed with the restaurant on site.  After eight years of the Blue Lady and Phil's Grille at Brushwood it was difficult to adjust to something new.  (When it's 95 degrees outside, bottled water should NEVER cost 2.50 a bottle.)  And in a lot of ways I didn't even get the chance to adjust since they closed the kitchen rather early, 8:30 or so.

 


As far as the festival its self goes, what I loved the most about it was just how laid back it was.  After tension so noticeable you could cut it with a knife at the last few Starwoods (held at Brushwood), it was nice to visit a Starwood where that was blessedly absent.  Everyone seemed to check their ego at the door this time around, and the whole campground seemed to delight in each others company.  I did things I've never done before, like sit in the ACE (Association for Consciousness Exploration-the organizers of Starwood) tent, talk to other presenters, and just relax.  

 


When I said there were problems, I wasn't kidding.  Starwood Radio barely got off the ground.  The area picked for midnight rituals lacked any sort of lighting, and was extremely inaccessible that late at night.  Raquy and her Cavemen thought that drumming over Ivan Stang's annual devival showed good manners, so yeah, problems, but they were overshadowed by the good that was there.  

 


Some of that good was Ivan Stang making fun of me and my workshops three times over the course of a rant, what an honor!  Seriously, that made my day.  The drum circle that people went to (I think it was called Paw Paw?) was gorgeous if a little cramped.  Camping and dancing in a small clearing surrounded by trees is simply magickal.  Hell yeah that was a good spot.  My workshops were pretty well attended for an outdoor festival too (especially after I heard the average attendance was about five people, I was lucky enough to score about 20 per talk).  

 


Starwood featured some of the best music they've had in awhile.  I managed to sit through an entire show for the first time in forever as Ari and I really liked the band Coyote Run.  Coyote Run is mostly a Celtic-type act, and they played with energy and passion and were just a delight for their entire two hour set.  We really liked them.  I hope they come back one of these years.

 

So all in all, a very good Starwood spent with lovely friends in a beautiful setting.


 

Brushwood's Summerfest

Brushwood will probably always be my favorite Pagan (or Pagan friendly) campground, though Summerfest was my least favorite festival of the last few weeks.  Visiting Brushwood is always special, I have so many friends who are seasonal campers there, and the lank speaks to me in a way that few others have, but with very few exceptions I found myself bored a lot of the time.

 

Those exceptions were some of my favorite nights of July though.  I loved Brushwood's "Party Like a Rockstar" and for two and a half hours i had a blast playing Marilyn Manson, Weezer, Snoop Dog, and Dio.  What was kind of a bummer was starting a good solid hour later than planned and being moved to a new location just six hours before our start time.  It gave the whole thing a very unorganized feel, and that's not something I'm used to from the folks at Brushwood (who are generally on top of things).

 


The other thing I loved was the Bellydance Showcase Ari (and our friend Laura) put together.  I also get to MC it.  How can you go wrong MC'ing an event full of hot women?  That's great.  The attendance was great too, they had fifty or so people show up, more than what showed up for the big concert going on at the same time that night.  The only downside was that it was held at 10:00 pm, in a location without any real lights.  Hopefully that'll change next year.  


 

In a lot of ways Summerfest felt like a continuation of Sirius Rising, which is the festival at Brushwood the previous week, and that was either a good thing or a bad thing depending on your perspective.  I was hoping that it would be a little more Starwood-like:  midnight rituals, some parties, etc.  I can certainly understand Brushwood's desire to distance themselves from some of those elements** but to move away from all of them might be a mistake.


 

It was a good three weeks on the road, but right now I'm happy to be home.

 


*There are just certain things I do not like doing in port a johns.  It wasn't a deal breaker for me about going back, but no place can be my favorite campground without some flushers.

 


**People have constantly described Starwood as a "rave" for the past ten years.  I have never felt this description was accurate, or even close to accurate.  Starwood has attracted a few undesirables over the years, but the amount of parties and overall craziness has been exaggerated. 

 


Beltane at Circle Sancutary

Posted by panmankey on May 3, 2010 at 7:15 PM Comments comments (0)


This past weekend Ari and I had the privilege of visiting Circle Sanctuary up in Wisconsin and participating in their annual Beltane festival.  As far as Pagan festivals go, my invitation was put together pretty quickly after meeting Selena Fox (founder of Circle, High Priestess, Pagan Activist, amazing public speaker, etc.) at Convocation last February.  She invited me up to Circle and I was lucky enough to be able to make May work.

Last weekend was my first visit to Circle, and I'm hoping it won't be my last!  They've got a really great community up there near Madison, wonderful people, and they all went out of their way to make Ari and I feel like a part of things.  Once we got by friday evening's rain, and a few hours of not knowing anyone, we nearly felt like we were at home, or at least Starwood.    

As we were getting settled in, trying to walk around (between rain storms) Ari asked me what I do when I go to festivals by myself.  The first few hours at a new place are a little difficult, especially when I don't more than one or two people (and that's usually the festival organizers).  After a workshop or two that tends to no longer be the case, but until then I keep a big stack of books handy to overcome any boredom that might spring up.  (It's especially hard to meet people when it's raining too!)

Once we hit up the opening ritual any worries that we weren't going to fit in over the weekend instantly fell by the wayside.  Everyone was just so damned nice to us.  What's really amazing is that Circle's Beltane was a mostly Wisconsin/Illinois event, but it never felt cliquey and we never felt like outsiders.  There's just such a focus on community at Starwood, and it seems to be a lesson that everyone there has gotten.

Post opening ritual we spent most of friday evening talking with Amy (from Starwood and a billion other festivals) and hanging around the campfire.  We sipped cider (me) and whiskey (Ari) and searched the clear bright skies for shooting stars, we even saw a couple.  When the moon finally peaked her face out around 1 am we headed to bed, I had an early workshop saturday morning.

Saturday I got to do my "Pan:  The God of All" workshop for a very enthusiastic audience, and a surprisingly large one for an early workshop at an outdoor festival.  People laughed, I told penis jokes, I talked about Pan in Ancient Greece, no one fell asleep, I think it was a success.  I sold out of Horned God books when I was done, that was pretty cool.  I hadn't done the Pan workshop in over a year, and I was surprised to find myself not too rusty.  

Post workshop the rest of the day was a blur of food, ritual, Morris Dancers, mead, conversation, etc etc.  Just lots to do, without it all feeling overwhelming.  The day was spaced nicely is a good way of putting it.  Post workshop and Morris Dancers Ari and I went on a walk through the Circle grounds (over 40 acres of woods and prairie).  Near the end of our walk together I decided it might be fun to climb one of the large hills surrounding us (Circle's camping/working grounds are in a valley).  Ari opted out so I pressed on alone.  

There was a spot I wanted to get to because I thought it would offer an amazing view, but getting there was a lot harder than I thought it would be.  I ended up off the beaten trail by about 100 paces, and much of the route I was trying to take was covered by small trees with thorns on them.  Getting up the hill wasn't much of a problem, but getting back down ended up being one, and my troubles were rewarded with a half dozen of scratches on my legs and feet.  (Note to self:  hiking in shorts and sandals through brush is kind of stupid.)

Once I returned to camp the rest of the night was spent maypole dancing, mead tasting, and talking to lots of folks.  There were too many people at the ritual for everyone to get a ribbon around the maypole, but touching the thing near the end of the ritual was more than enough.  The maypole at Cirlce was just humming with energy, powerful stuff.  Ari was lucky enough to be one of the Maypole dancers, and the prettiest one there too (I'm biased, but it might very well be true).

Food was communal the entire weekend and it was fantastic.  The kitchen was right below our room and those people must have spent 15 hours a day in there preparing meals.  They met the challenge of preparing food for 200 plus with ease, even my no onion, no red meat eating self had no trouble getting enough food.

Our Sunday at Circle was short.  I did the old Horned God Workshop (not well either) while Ari packed up the car.  Since I had done Pan the day before and there's a lot of overlap I wanted to change things around a lot and ignore a lot of the things I had mentioned the day before.  As a result, I was all over the place while speaking.  I was a bit disappointed with myself, but it was 9 in the morning, you can't expect a whole lot from me before I've had a pot or two of coffee.

Before we left Selena gave us a whirlwind tour of everything we missed at Circle.  The space they have up there is just awe-inspiring.  Perhaps the most powerful place is the cemetery.  Just knowing that there's a place for Pagan burials in the United States is heart warming.  Ari told me she wanted to buried there in 100 years or so when she passes.*  The ritual circle near by was also powerful, and next time I visit Circle I plan to do something up there.  

We had an eight hour drive home on sunday so we departed Circle rather quickly, but it's still humming inside our hearts.  Thanks to Selena and everyone else in Wisconsin who made our visit so special and so memorable.  I hope we get up there again soon.  


*Given the advances in medical science and her income potential she should probably outlive me by about 40 years and live to the age of 145.

Rss_feed